RE: [REVIEW REQUESTED][ARIA] placeholder

Actually, thinking of it further, since the aria-placeholder value wouldn't change, screen reader users may not be effected. However if whatever is visually represented disappeared onFocus, it may cause issues for other disability types. 

Presumably the setting of aria-placeholder is invisible? Meaning it's up to the author to write a visible mechanism for displaying the same information. Or is it intended for aria-placeholder to have a visual appearance handled by the browser in the same way that placeholder is?

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Garaventa [mailto:bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2015 8:22 PM
To: Joanmarie Diggs; Alexander Surkov
Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
Subject: RE: [REVIEW REQUESTED][ARIA] placeholder

Hi Joanie,
The proposed text looks good to me. I would like to make one suggestion though.

Where it states

"Authors SHOULD present this hint to the user by displaying the text when the control's Value is the empty string, especially if the control is not focused."

It might also be good to add that the hint should only be removed after the user starts typing, and not onFocus, otherwise screen reader users are more likely to miss it during navigation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joanmarie Diggs [mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2015 9:47 AM
To: Alexander Surkov
Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
Subject: Re: [REVIEW REQUESTED][ARIA] placeholder

Hi Alex, all.

The questions and discussion that have resulted from my review request are important topics and need to be resolved. However, whether or not the placeholder should be a name fallback seems like a question for the accessible name computation spec. And how to expose the placeholder to platforms seems like a question for the user agent implementation spec.

As a screen reader developer, I myself have opinions on both topics. :) But as an ARIA spec co-editor who has been tasked with the creation of an aria-placeholder attribute, the intent of my review request was to ascertain the following:

1. Do we have consensus that the addition of this attribute is indeed
   needed? If so,
2. What changes to the proposed ARIA spec text need to be made before we
   are ready to officially add this attribute to ARIA 1.1?

If the group feels we cannot answer 1 and/or 2 until we resolve these other topics, that's fine with me. But then it would be helpful if that was explicitly stated because it's not clear to me from this thread. And I cannot do the will of the group if I don't understand what the will of the group is. :)

--joanie

On 04/02/2015 03:36 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> Hey. I'm agree that placeholder has different semantics than label and 
> value but I'm still not certain about how this semantics can be used 
> by AT. The point is if there's no consumers for it then there's no 
> great benefit from having it. Iirc we started this chat before but I 
> don't recall what outcome was. SO do we have any data how AT 
> developers want to handle @placeholder? Firefox was used to map HTML 
> @placeholder into accessible name and it seems it worked fine with AT.
> 
> Btw, I'm not sure I agree that placeholder cannot be used instead of 
> label. That should be the use case for mobile web. On the other hand 
> there are examples of minimalistic UI on desktop, like searchbox on 
> DEVMO page [1] that doesn't have a label.
> 
> Thanks.
> Alex.
> 
> [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/

> 
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com 
> <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hey all.
> 
>     I'm pretty sure that I've incorporated everyone's feedback into my
>     proposal for aria-placeholder. But I would like a final review just to
>     be sure as the discussion seems to have stopped. Here's the branch:
>     
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action-1349/aria/aria.html#aria-placeholde

> r
> 
>     As per the discussion at today's ARIA concall, if there is no feedback
>     on this by next week, I shall merge it into master.
> 
>     --joanie
> 
>

Received on Sunday, 5 April 2015 05:29:15 UTC