- From: Marco Zehe <marco.zehe@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 14:31:57 +0200
- To: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, public-pfwg@w3.org
Hi Joseph, I found a few pieces in the minutes where Chris G. and I got mixed up. On 05.05.2014 20:41, Joseph Scheuhammer wrote: > JC: I prefere the "by" and not the "for". > > MZ: I spoke to some people in the Windows team about flowsto > and they wanted to create a flowsfrom > ... And they found it easier if there was only one direction. > That was actually CG, not me. > JC: Did they say what the problem is if the reverse does not > match up? > > MZ: No. > Same. > JC: That is part of the discussion. To get references in sync. > ... It's easier if it's just one direction. > > <jamesn> +1 to that > > RS: Let's summarize where we have agreement. Is "by" preferred > to "from"? > > <someone> : agreed. > That *was* me. :-) The rest of the minutes are OK from my end. Thanks, Marco
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 12:32:39 UTC