Re: PF editors

Permalinks on titles could be a useful addition to ReSpec. Optional, of course.

On Mar 27, 2014, at 5:10 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:

> De nada.  It was pretty straightforward.  I am going to tinker with getting it to look more like the original as an exercise.  Like the perma-link tags.  Those are adorable.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:00 AM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
> Thanks for tackling this effort Shane. It's really appreciated.
> 
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
> 
>> Michael got the github repo set up today.  I started populating it and have an initial cut at the aria spec in the spec sub directory.  Still work to do, but it is not a bad start for a few hours work.
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> I might be late due to weather and traffic delays. Probably 15 min after the hour like Joseph.
>> 
>> Copy cat. :-)
>> 
>> Alas, I'm still confused by DST here in North America and not-DST in Europe.  My other telecon today is based in Europe and starts 1:00pm my time, and not noon as I thought on Mon.  That overlaps exactly with our editors' meeting.  I will miss the editors' meeting.
>> 
>> I know it was me who proposed the time, and my apologies for my last minute ditch, but something has to give.
>> 
>> In terms of my opinions -- I think ReSpec is the way forward, and git or hg are vast improvements over CVS.  I'm more familar with git and so favour it, and, consequently, I'm in favour of using github as well.
>> 
>> But, I realize that will mean some work to convert from the current XSL-based build system.
>> 
>> Again, my apologies.
>> 
>> -- 
>> ;;;;joseph.
>> 
>> 
>> 'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
>> 'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
>>              - J. D. Klaun -
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 19:39:31 UTC