Based on Michael's detailed email covering the pros and cons I also agree
with github and respec. Also, github is used by a lot of software
developers. As we bring in new people it will be helpful to provide them
with a tool they are familiar with.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, "W3C WAI Protocols &
Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>,
Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Joseph Scheuhammer
<clown@alum.mit.edu>
Date: 03/26/2014 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: PF editors
Sent by: ahby@aptest.com
I agree that github and respec is the way to go moving forward.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
Regrets I cannot make the meeting today.
My preference is to use Github and Respec as that is what I use for other
docs I edit (html5 etc). Its a workflow I am familiar with.
--
Regards
SteveF
HTML 5.1
On 25 March 2014 20:33, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Michael,
Thank for your detailed collection of options/pro-cons for the UAIG
suite of documents.
I am not a member of the PF editors list so Janina pointed me to this.
We should move pf-editing to a public space list. For now, I am posting
this to public-pwfg space.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-pf-editors/2014JanMar/0006.html
I know PF's name is also changing so we will be getting a whole new set
of lists.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
