- From: Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:29:11 +0000
- To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, "'James Craig'" <jcraig@apple.com>, "'WAI XTech'" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "'W3C WAI Protocols & Formats'" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- CC: "'Ted O'Connor'" <eoconnor@apple.com>, "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>
+1 on JF comments On 12/11/14, 12:53 PM, "John Foliot" <john@foliot.ca> wrote: >James Craig wrote: >> >> Even though the term has been in the published working draft for six >> months, the editorial note reference of "at-risk" seems to be a primary >> objection. > >Hi James, > >I just wanted to jump in here to a) say thanks for making this editorial >change, and b) I personally felt that you were NOT wrong in pointing out >the >editorial note in the current draft. While it is/was somewhat unusual to >use >the language you chose (the new edit is much better), it WAS responsible >of >you to point it out, and to ensure that there is ongoing discussion around >this particular attribute. More than anything else, I think we need to >continue talking about this, and your pointing it out has kicked-off that >discussion. > >Also, just in case nobody has said it recently, thanks for your hard work >and dedication to the ARIA effort - I for one do appreciate it. > >Cheers! > >JF > >(PS - I hope you find some time to respond to some of my other questions, >posted earlier) > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 20:30:08 UTC