W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg-comments@w3.org > January to March 2013

Response to your comments on Role Attribute

From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:24:43 +0000
Message-Id: <E1ULCot-0005Gb-FU@tibor.w3.org>
To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
CC: PFWG Public Comments <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>
Dear Steven Pemberton:

Thank you for your comments on the 13 December 2012 Proposed Recommendation
of Role Attribute (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-role-attribute-20121213/).
The Protocols and Formats Working Group has reviewed all comments received
on the draft. 

Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our
resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the archived
copy of your original comment on
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/, and may also
include links to the relevant changes in the Role Attribute editors' draft


Janina Sajka, PFWG Chair
Michael Cooper, PFWG Staff Contact

Comment 387: Acknowledgements
Date: 2013-01-31
Archived at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2013JanMar/0000.html
Relates to: Role Attribute <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-role-attribute-20121213/>
Status: Accepted proposal

Your comment:
Between http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xhtml-role-20101216/ and
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-role-attribute-20110113/ my name got dropped
from the list of authors (not sure why). If there was a reason, I would
appreciate being listed as a previous author in the acknowledgements. 

Response from the Working Group:
We apologize for this oversight. Somehow your name was dropped when the
document was taken over by the PFWG, but it was clearly erroneous. We have
corrected this.
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2013 13:24:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:03 UTC