W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg-comments@w3.org > January to March 2013

Response to your comments on WAI-ARIA 1.0 Authoring Practices

From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:58:06 +0000
Message-Id: <E1UALyo-0002gx-B6@tibor.w3.org>
To: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
CC: PFWG Public Comments <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>
Dear Johannes Koch:

Thank you for your comments on the 16 September 2010 Working Draft of
WAI-ARIA 1.0 Authoring Practices
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-wai-aria-practices-20100916/). The Protocols
and Formats Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the draft.
We would like to know whether we have understood your comments correctly
and whether you are satisfied with our resolutions.

Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to us
by 8 March 2013 to say whether you accept them or to discuss additional
concerns you have with our response. If we do not hear from you by that
date, we will mark your comment as "no response" and close it. If you need
more time to consider your acknowledgement, please let us know. You can
respond in the following ways:

* If you have a W3C account, we request that you respond online at
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/comments/acknowledge?document_version_id=10;

* Else, by email to public-pfwg-comments@w3.org (be sure to reference our
comment ID so we can track your response). Note that this list is publicly
archived.

Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our
resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the archived
copy of your original comment on
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/, and may also
include links to the relevant changes in the WAI-ARIA 1.0 Authoring
Practices editors' draft at http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/.

Note that if you still strongly disagree with our resolution on an issue,
you have the opportunity to file a formal objection (according to 3.3.2 of
the W3C Process, at
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGArchiveMinorityViews)
to public-pfwg-comments@w3.org. Formal objections will be reviewed with the
Director before the document is finalized as a Working Group Note, unless
we can come to agreement with you on a resolution in advance of the
meeting.

Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we cannot
always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the comments are
valuable to the development of WAI-ARIA 1.0 Authoring Practices.

Regards,

Janina Sajka, PFWG Chair
Michael Cooper, PFWG Staff Contact


Comment 351: aria-haspopup
Date: 2010-11-17
Archived at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2010OctDec/0015.html
Relates to: WAI-ARIA 1.0 Authoring Practices - Menu (widget) <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-wai-aria-practices-20100916/#menu>
Status: Accepted proposal

-------------
Your comment:
-------------
in "WAI-ARIA 1.0 Authoring Practices", section 10 -> menu 
(<http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices/#menu>)

Table "Characteristics", row "WAI-ARIA Roles, States, and Properties:",
second cell, third bullet:

> If activation of your menuitem produces a popup menu, then the menuitem
should have aria-haspopup set to the ID of the corresponding menu to allow
the assistive technology to follow the menu hierarchy and assist the user
in determining context during menu navigation.

According to 
<http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/states_and_properties#aria-haspopup>

the value of the aria-haspopup property is true or false. Should one use
the aria-controls property
(<http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/states_and_properties#aria-controls>) set
to the ID of the corresponding menu?

<li role="menuitem" aria-expanded="true" aria-haspopup="true"
     aria-controls="menu01">File
   <ul role="menu" id="menu01">
     <li role="menuitem">Open</li>
     <!-- ... -->
   </ul>
</li>

--------------------------------
Response from the Working Group:
--------------------------------
We have changed the text to read:

If activation of your menuitem produces a popup menu, then the menuitem
should have aria-haspopup set to "true" so that an assistive technology
knows that the menuitem has a sub menu.

To answer your question about aria-controls, it is unnecessary to set the
controls relationship between the menuitem and the popup menu. Since these
are popup windows the ATs are also tracking system events to track the
menu/submenu hierarchy. Consequently there was no need to use and ID for
aria-haspopup or the controls relationship to establish the relationships
between menus.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 14:58:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 February 2013 14:58:12 GMT