W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg-comments@w3.org > July to September 2010

ARIA "status" role definition should make clear that it is intended to be a status bar

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:52:59 -0700
Message-id: <1132D68F-4794-43CF-BB5A-1D552BE1831F@apple.com>
Cc: Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>
To: public-pfwg-comments@w3.org

The ARIA definition of the "status" role says:

------------
A container whose content is advisory information for the user but is not important enough to justify an alert. Also see alert.
Authors MUST provide status information content within a status object. Authors SHOULD ensure this object does not receive focus.

Status is a form of live region. If another part of the page controls what appears in the status, authors SHOULD make the relationshipexplicit with the aria-controls attribute.
------------


This seems very general, and like something that could apply to the HTML5 <output> element for instance. However, according to Steve Faulkner, this is meant to be mapped to a status bar role in platform accessibility APIs, which would likely make it inappropriate for <output>. Please correct the definition in ARIA to make clear that it is not intended to be used only for status bars or similar constructs.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 09:53:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:02 GMT