aria-required vs. aria-expanded as global states/properties from Henri Sivonen on 2009-05-21 (public-pfwg-comments@w3.org from April to June 2009)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:34:15 +0300
To: public-pfwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E60692F5-FBBA-4D40-B8B1-C532C7EA28C3@iki.fi>

What's the logic behind aria-required being global but aria-expanded  
not being global? It seems to me that aria-expanded would be closer to  
globally applicable than aria-required, which only makes sense for  
inputs (including contenteditable).

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 11:34:59 UTC