On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:59:16 +0100, Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net> wrote: > > aloha! > > when i asked neil soiffer to review my proposal for the math role, he > kindly responded with the following suggested definition: > > <q cite="NeilSoiffer"> > Definition: content that represents a mathematical expression. This > could > be an accessible format such as MathML, or it can be other textual > representation that can be converted to an accessible format such as TeX. > This also includes images that represent math. Such images may have > alternative text or long descriptions that can be converted to an > accessible format, or the image itself may have embedded comments that > can > be made accessible. OCR could even be used to interpret the image as > mathematics. This role enables a plug-in mechanism to provide compliant > MathML, as well as enabling support for MathML in "mainstream" user > agents. > </q> It seems unnecessary to say role='math' on MathML content -- surely it is implied that MathML content is math. I would suggest that it be defined exactly what role='math' means so that implementors and authors know what to do, as in e.g.: Definition: content that represents a mathematical expression expressed in TeX. [TEX] If the element is an HTML "img" element, then the content of the alt attribute represents the expression, otherwise the element's textContent DOM attribute represents the expression. [HTML4] [DOM3CORE] (I don't know if TeX is the best way to represent a mathematical expression in plain text, but in any case I think we need to say which it is and not let it be an open-ended anything-goes.) -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:19:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:05 GMT