- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:07:03 -0400
- To: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@bluemars.net>, public-pfwg-comments@w3.org
Thank you for the comment, and particularly thank you for the test resource. We will look into this. Al At 2:31 PM +0200 9/28/06, Martin Kliehm wrote: >The doctype declaration in code examples is often incorrect: >sometimes only the exclamation mark in <!DOCTYPE is missing, >sometimes the URI. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-state-20060926/#docconf > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-state-20060926/#module_element_xhtml > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-state-20060926/#default_prefix > >Also the W3C validator does not recognize any new AAA attributes, no >matter if they are prefixed or not. Since the validator is indeed >capable to handle modular XHTML, I assume there must be an error >within the DTD itself. > >Here is a simple test case with the example from "3.1.1.1.1 The >Default Prefix," but without the role attribute (which is used in >the example, but not incorporated in the example DTD or namespace) >[1][2]. > >I have tested the State module in combination with the Role >Attribute module, and the validator error message is the same as in >this simple test case [3][4]. So I suppose the error lies in the >namespace module (aaa-qname.mod), alas I couldn't figure out where. > >Also I have noticed in aaa-qname.mod that there is a suggested >different approach when AAA is used together with the Role Attribute >module, alas it is unclear how this could be achieved. Since AAA >with Role will be a common combination, it would be useful to >provide an example in the draft. > >Best regards, > Martin > >[1] http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-dtd >[2] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-dtd >[3] http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-xdtd >[4] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-xdtd
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 16:30:19 UTC