I think it is a good plan. One question: May those participants who are in the Personalization TF and who are also interested or have direct or indirect experience with cognitive disability be involved in some way if this moves to COGA? Best, Thaddeus On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:08 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > Hi Folks > > I was thinking about what Janina was saying on the call yesterday And I am > not sure we gave it enough air time (or I may have spoken to much...) In a > nut shell maybe the coga task force should be making these terms about > support in alternative content (the module 2 vocabulary ) as part of their > work and we create the pointing mechanism. It would make us a bit like > EARL. > > Originally this work was done as part of COGA. We moved to ARIA and now > APA, but maybe this piece should go back to coga. I think in terms of > understanding how to build a vocabulary we may be the better address. > Is that the proposal or are you now happy with it staying with us? > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 14:55:22 UTC