Minutes [Was: [Agenda] 14 Feb 2017 Payment Apps task force call]

Hi all,

Minutes from today’s payment apps call:
  https://www.w3.org/2017/02/14-apps-minutes#item06

Next call: 21 February

Ian


> On Feb 13, 2017, at 12:33 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Participants in the payments app task force,
> 
> We meet 14 January at 10am ET. 
> 
> Previous meeting 7 February:
>  https://www.w3.org/2017/02/07-apps-minutes
> 
> WebEx: 
> http://www.w3.org/2017/01/paymentapps-2017.ics
> 
> Ian
> 
> ========
> I continue to update the "Proposal" based on discussion:
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/wiki/Proposal-20170130
> 
> 
> Here are the primary issues [0] and where I think we are.
> [0] https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> Information provided to the payment app (99)
> Consensus to use new request/response objects for payment apps
> 
> See Marcos' suggestion that the objects align well with those in PR API
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2017Feb/0016.html
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> OPENING WINDOWS (73, 97). 
> Consensus to a new openClientWindow method.
> 
>  ACTION: Marcos and Tommy to draft a proposal for openClientWindow.
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> FILTERS/CAPABILITIES (83, 96)
> 
>  ACTION: Task force to review Ian's proposal (for browser's matching string sets) and thread:
>  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/96#issuecomment-278754087
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> SETTING PAYMENT METHOD INFORMATION (95) 
> 
>  ACTION: Task force to review Adrian's proposal (to use a new structure for payment app input and response data):
>  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/99#issuecomment-278326772
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> RECOMMENDED PAYMENT APPS (74, 79)
> 
>  ACTION: Task force to review Ian's proposal (to drop Recommended payment apps
>                 from the payment app API but continue to investigate as a separate layer):
>  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/74#issuecomment-278340715
> 
>  ACTION: Task force to review Tommy's approach to recommending apps when none available:
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/74#issuecomment-278941318
> 
>  Should we put that code on the new developer site?
>  https://github.com/w3c/payment-request-info
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> DISPLAY OF OPTIONS / GRANULARITY (90)
> Consensus not to require user agents to display options if provided.
> Still discussing use cases and granularity requirements (including desktop)
> 
>  ACTION: Andre to write up use cases for "wallet" containers within a payment app.
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> ICONS AND LABELS / GRANULARITY (69, 70, 90))
> 
>  ACTION: AdamR to write a proposal for providing icons and labels for different granularities.
>                  Some were discussed 31 Jan: https://www.w3.org/2017/01/31-apps-minutes#item01
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> SETTING PAYMENT METHOD INFORMATION (95)
> 
>  ACTION: AdamR to write a proposal for setting payment method information at finer grain than setManifest. 
>                  The proposal will take into account Mathieu's desire for easy reset.
> 
> ======================
> Next steps on the spec
> 
> * Marcos suggested [1] that we write code to demonstrate the following:
> 
>   - Getting permission
>   - adding, removing, updating, payment methods
>   - handling .canMakePayment(),
>   - handling POSTing for payment (without a secure window).
>   - Getting the browser to open a secure window
>   - handling PaymentRequest .abort(), .updateWith()
>   - creating a PaymentResponse - and showing how it coordinates
>     between the secure window and merchant.
> 
>   Marcos asked for one or more people to work with him on this code.
> 
>   VOLUNTEERS?
> 
> * I would like to update the Payment App API based on the recent
>   discussions and clearer model. I can spend some time on that
>   this week and next. The goal is to have an updated specification
>   for discussion at the FTF meeting.
> 
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2017Feb/0016.html
> 
> =======
> Next meeting
> 
> * 21 February
> 
> ========
> Other issues
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 718 260 9447

Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 17:04:08 UTC