Re: Call for Consensus on Publishing Web Payments Overview 1.0 as a Working Group Note - RESPONSE REQUESTED

So do we. Answer 1.
Great job.
Have a good day
m

--
Security Architect @ Blockstream

mp@blockstream.com <mailto:mp@blockstream.com>

+491703311307 (Germany)
+14159608938 (U.S)
Signal, Wickr (martap).

Sent from a mobile device, please excuse typos.

On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Jason Normore <jason.normore@shopify.com <mailto:jason.normore@shopify.com>> wrote:

> Shopify supports the proposal (1).
> 
> 
> Jason
> 
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 6:28 AM Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io <mailto:shane@spec-ops.io>> wrote:
> Answer 1: ship it!
> 
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org <mailto:ij@w3.org>> wrote:
> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
> 
> At the F2F in Lisbon there was support [1] for issuing a Call for
> Consensus (CfC) to publish the following as a Working Group Note:
> 
>  Web Payments Overview 1.0
>  https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/ <https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/>
> 
> We would like to thank the editors for preparing this document.
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus to publish it as a Working Group Note.
> 
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 7 October 2016 (1pm ET).
> 
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/20-wpwg-minutes#item06 <https://www.w3.org/2016/09/20-wpwg-minutes#item06>
> 
> =========
> PROPOSAL
> 
> Request that the W3C Director approve the following for publication
> as a Working Group Note:
> 
>  Web Payments Overview 1.0
>  https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/ <https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/>
> 
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
> 
>  1. Support the proposal.
> 
>  2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>      if suggested changes are not taken into account.
> 
>  3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>      unless the changes are taken into account.
> 
>  4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
> 
>  5. Support the consensus of the WPWG.
> 
>  6. Abstain.
> 
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
> 
> If there is strong consensus by 7 October 2016 (1pm ET) for the
> proposal, it will carry.
> 
> ====================
> REMINDERS ABOUT NOTES, CONSENSUS, AND FORMAL OBJECTIONS
> 
> * Publication as a Working Group Note does NOT indicate that a document
>   is complete or represents Working Group consensus.
> 
> * In case of a decision to publish, the Chairs will request approval
>  to publish a Working Group Note. In this case, if you wish your LACK
>  of support to publish to be conveyed to the W3C Director and
>  reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" [2] in your
>  response and be sure to include substantive arguments or rationale.
> 
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [2].
> 
> * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore
>  they typically require significant time and effort to
>  address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues
>  related to the scope of these documents rather than technical
>  content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision.
> 
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>  individual(s) who made the Formal Objection to see whether there are
>  changes that would address the concern and increase consensus to
>  publish.
> 
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#Consensus <https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#Consensus>
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org <mailto:ij@w3.org>>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs <http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs>
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447 <tel:%2B1%20718%20260%209447>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops