RE: Call for Consensus on Publishing Web Payments Overview 1.0 as a Working Group Note - RESPONSE REQUESTED

Knowbility Supports this effort. Publish!

​​​​​



* katie *
 
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
 
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog


-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 3:54 PM
To: Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Call for Consensus on Publishing Web Payments Overview 1.0 as a Working Group Note - RESPONSE REQUESTED

Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,

At the F2F in Lisbon there was support [1] for issuing a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the following as a Working Group Note:

 Web Payments Overview 1.0
 https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/

We would like to thank the editors for preparing this document.

This is a Call for Consensus to publish it as a Working Group Note.

PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 7 October 2016 (1pm ET).

For the co-Chairs,
Ian Jacobs

[1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/20-wpwg-minutes#item06

=========
PROPOSAL

Request that the W3C Director approve the following for publication as a Working Group Note:

 Web Payments Overview 1.0
 https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/

Please indicate one of the following in your response:

 1. Support the proposal.

 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
     if suggested changes are not taken into account.

 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
     unless the changes are taken into account.

 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).

 5. Support the consensus of the WPWG.

 6. Abstain.

We invite you to include rationale in your response.

If there is strong consensus by 7 October 2016 (1pm ET) for the proposal, it will carry.

====================
REMINDERS ABOUT NOTES, CONSENSUS, AND FORMAL OBJECTIONS

* Publication as a Working Group Note does NOT indicate that a document
  is complete or represents Working Group consensus.

* In case of a decision to publish, the Chairs will request approval  to publish a Working Group Note. In this case, if you wish your LACK  of support to publish to be conveyed to the W3C Director and  reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" [2] in your  response and be sure to include substantive arguments or rationale.

* Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [2].

* The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore  they typically require significant time and effort to  address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues  related to the scope of these documents rather than technical  content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision.

* If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
 individual(s) who made the Formal Objection to see whether there are  changes that would address the concern and increase consensus to  publish.

[2] https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#Consensus

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 13:08:59 UTC