[Agenda] 30 November Payments Apps Task Force Call

Participants in the payments app task force,

We meet 30 November at 9am ET. Draft agenda below.

Previous meeting 23 November:
 https://www.w3.org/2016/11/23-apps-minutes

WebEx (as usual):
 https://www.w3.org/2016/08/payment-apps-tf.ics

Possible regrets: AdrianHB.

Ian

========
Upcoming meeting schedule:
* 7 Dec, 14 Dec, 4 Jan 2017

ACTION Ian 20161116: Look into a new meeting time based on who is participating in the call.

Let's discuss a new weekly meeting time:
 * Tuesdays, 10am ET or 11am ET (for 1 hour)
 * Participation from Asia has described, while participation on the
   West Coast and Europe has increased.

========
Recent spec edits

 * Tommy edits regarding cancelation and failure handling:
   https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/commit/9dcf7d251d1c1f00b13825f96123d5dcc124e105#diff-eacf331f0ffc35d4b482f1d15a887d3b

   Propose to close Tommy's action from 20161123: Write a proposal for
   section 10.4 around issue 37 to consider (1) graceful failure in
   the case of cancelation and (2) mention of retry.

 * WebIDL fix
   https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/71/commits/738e08739133a6e52482db7446b473ad7fe2f64b

========
Pull request review:

(AHB and Ian have not yet had time to close this one; we may have to wait a week.)

* Removed notions of open/proprietary; AdrianHB requested changes
  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/70

ACTION Ian 20161123: Add a pointer from the spec to the issue of UA
retrying other matching payment apps after cancelation or failure.

See https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/70/commits/7553f82cd9c45fe38e04f08efc2aaf9c79ad4f1f

========
Issue 69: What does Icon mean?
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/69

ACTION Ian 20161123: Update the payment app spec to copy web app manifest term for icon_s.

Status: Proposal:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/69#issuecomment-263610143

========
Issue 48: Payment app identifier to payment app manifest filename mapping
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/48

Proposal from Adrian:
  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/48#issuecomment-261786242

========
Filtering

ACTION 20161102: AdamR to take a stab at writing up description of payment app function to return boolean if filter matches; see
https://www.w3.org/2016/11/02-apps-minutes.html#item03

========
Payment app pilots

* Update on Opera/Samsung work on Chromium version that can
  support service-worker based payment apps.

========
Issue 12: Passing details on payment options
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/12

Let's return to the question of whether payment option
details should be passed to the mediator for display.
Any updates based on implementation experience?

========
Other issues

* Review of open issues
  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447

Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:10:02 UTC