Summary of feedback on proposed adoption of Core Messages/HTTP API

Hi all,

Below is a tally of feedback on the proposed adoption of the Core
Messages and HTTP API specs. Note that I only counted organizations that
specifically said that they are in favor/opposed to a particular
specification. I did not count organizations that were vague in their
support or did not mention a particular spec explicitly.

In favor of adopting Core Messages (with proposed changes taken into
account):

ISO20022 Registration Authority (SWIFT)
Worldpay
Blockstream
Digital Bazaar
Spec Ops

In favor of adopting Web Payments HTTP API (with proposed changes taken
into account):

ISO20022 Registration Authority (SWIFT)
Worldpay
Opera (but only a +0.1)
Blockstream
Knowability
Digital Bazaar
Spec Ops

Not in favor of adopting either spec at this point:

W3C Staff

There are also two other organizations that I spoke with over the phone
that said they strongly support the HTTP API and Core Messages and said
they'd try to get comments in by the call tomorrow. Unfortunately, both
organization's reps are either travelling or have been under an
extremely heavy workload for the past several weeks.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/

Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 01:15:06 UTC