Sanity check on API using flows from Flows Task Force

Hi Matt and the rest of the Flows Task Force,

In order to get a sanity check on the Web Payments CG Browser API
proposal, we've started checking the API against the flows that the
Flows Task Force has been working on. We're doing this by writing code
that uses the payments API to match the flows. The result can be found here:

http://wicg.github.io/web-payments-browser-api/#flows-addendum

We've integrated the legacy card, tokenized card, SEPA Credit Transfer,
and basic Bitcoin flows for now. The good news is that there is very
little variation between each payment scheme so far (which demonstrates
that the API is fairly generic, which is a good thing).

We'd be interested in your feedback. For example, we think we've made a
mistake in the PSP-mediated SEPA Credit Transfer use case, but can't
quite figure out where.

In any case, just a heads up that we've started integrating the flows
and apologies for taking so long to get around to this.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/

Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 22:51:45 UTC