- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:43:30 -0500
- To: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
On 12/01/2015 10:58 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote: > In looking at the list on the wiki I don't think these are ready to > be captured as issues yet in the issue tracker. Oops, sorry, I didn't see this email before converting some of the issues. Our engineers pointed it out to me this morning, sorry about that. > Rather than fill the issue tracker up prematurely let's discuss an > approach to filtering and refining this list on Thursdays call and > then assign some actions to have them captured as issues. I think we're over-thinking this. Github's issue tracker is built around raising, refining, and closing issues fast. I don't think we should make it more difficult to get issues into the tracker. > I also think we will have more luck in dealing with issues once we > have the start of a spec to refer to and the impact of the different > ways of addressing the issue are more clear. I disagree. I don't think we're going to be able to have the start of a spec before processing/discussing some of these issues. > I will put this on Thursday's agenda. Thanks. :) -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2015 17:43:55 UTC