W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > March 2005

RE: Comments on P3P WD Schema Stuff

From: Giles Hogben <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:36:08 +0100
To: public-p3p-spec@w3.org
Message-id: <001001c52333$c3f254f0$432abf8b@cs.jrc.it>

Fine with me.

>**-----Original Message-----
>**From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] 
>**Sent: 07 March 2005 17:15
>**To: Giles Hogben
>**Cc: public-p3p-spec@w3.org
>**Subject: Re: Comments on P3P WD Schema Stuff
>**
>**
>**Hm, 
>**
>**one can and even should use the P3P dataschema for form-fillers. But 
>**there has to be a warning. A formfiller using P3P dataschema is not 
>**doing any harm. It is rather the fact that statements about 
>**a certain 
>**URI could be misunderstood as the minimum required 
>**information. So the 
>**first sentence doesn't fit my needs. I suggest:
>**
>**
>**==============================================================
>**It is important to note that in the context of the P3P protocol, 
>**expressions of dataschema and categories are not requests for 
>**particular data types, but rather statements about data handling 
>**practices for data types which you should assume an entity will 
>**collect.
>**==============================================================
>**
>**Rigo
>**
>**Am Monday 07 March 2005 16:53 verlautbarte Giles Hogben :
>**> How about this:
>**> It is important to note that P3P is NOT designed to be used in
>**> auto-form filling applications. This is because P3P 
>**policies are not
>**> requests for particular data types, but rather statements 
>**about data
>**> handling practices for data types which you should assume an entity
>**> will collect.
>**>
>**
Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 16:31:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Monday, 7 March 2005 16:31:54 GMT