But in this case, I would rather have it at the beginning of Section 5 Dataschemas instead of melting it somewhat into 5.1.2. So what would be your suggestion? Rigo Am Monday 07 March 2005 16:23 verlautbarte Giles Hogben : > I think something needs to be included to say that P3P is NEVER a > request for a particular data type then. > I'm trying to avoid the errors we had on this issue previously with > people trying to use P3P as a wallet protocol.Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 15:36:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Monday, 7 March 2005 15:36:27 GMT