W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > August 2005

Re: basedataschema

From: <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:02:17 +0200
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Cc: "'public-p3p-spec'" <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
Message-id: <11a268877abe.430af429@jrc.it>
That's really odd - as far as I am aware I made no changes to the original data schema. Perhaps I used a different version. Do whatever you want with the old one...

----- Original Message -----
From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:42 pm
Subject: basedataschema


In the original basedataschema, it says:

<DATA-STRUCT name="date.hms.minute"

In the version you've sent, it says:

<DATA-STRUCT name="date.hms.minute"

So you used plural. Does that have any meaning and doesn't break that 
the compatibility? What should I add?

Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 08:02:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:19 UTC