W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Base Data Schema definition

From: <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:00:46 +0200
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Cc: "'public-p3p-spec'" <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
Message-id: <11a1b34f5869.430af3ce@jrc.it>
xsd:import looks closed to me.
It validated so the syntax should  be OK.
Fine to change the namespace.

Not sure I understand the last question. I would leave that up to Lorrie.


----- Original Message -----
From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:30 pm
Subject: Base Data Schema definition



Giles, 

in your new base data schema draft, you start like this:

<xsd:schema 
  xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
  xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1" 
  xmlns:p3p="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1" 
  xmlns:p3pbds="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1" 
  elementFormDefault="qualified" 
  targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1">
     <xsd:import 
      schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1.xsd" 
      namespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1" />

I think, the targetNamespace MUST be something different. It should be a 
new namespace. Suggestion is /2005/08/BDS-P3P11

You fail to close <xsd:import>

Does that mean, the old 1.0 Schema should be replaced in the Spec as it 
is already in the 1.0 REC and can be imported from there? Or should we 
provide a combined XML Schema?

Best, 

Rigo
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 08:00:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 23 August 2005 08:00:55 GMT