W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > June 2004

Re: AGENDA: 23 June P3P Spec call

From: <massimo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4442.>
To: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: "public-p3p-spec" <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>

> 2. XML schema stuff - we need more input on whether it makes
> sense to make this change in P3P1.1 despite backwards compatibility
> issues
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-p3p-spec/2004Jun/0017.html

Before I forget to send some feedback...;)
a) I thought the proposal, time ago, was to add this on top of,
and not as a replacement, the original p3p1.0 mechanism, so
not having nasty backward-compatibility issues altogether.
Is this the case, or now the trend is to go with a replacement?

b) Second point: at p3p1.0 time, the schema solution was banned out
by all our major implementors, ie Microsoft, IBM, and Ericsson.
If this goes all the way thru, please be sure to get an ack
(or at least a "can live with") from the big players before

There were another tech points on compatibility when passing from
the p3p1.0 way to a schema-way, but whether exposing them is
worth really first depends on the answer to a), so I'll await for that ;)

Received on Monday, 21 June 2004 18:01:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:19 UTC