W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Call,OWL,XML Schema, JRC P3P1.1. Implementation

From: Giles Hogben <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:30:23 +0200
To: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@cs.cmu.edu>, public-p3p-spec@w3.org
Cc: rigo@w3.org
Message-ID: <1fa526a9.26a91fa5@sti.jrc.it>
Hi,
I've been through the introduction to this doc and added a few lines 
about backward compatibility in line with what we said on the last 
call. Please send me any comments. In doing so I noticed that the 
XSLT's need to be updated to include the extension syntax - so Rigo - 
don't publish those till I send you an updated version (I put a note 
in the text.) I should be able to do this by Sept 1.

Giles

----- Original Message -----
From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Monday, August 16, 2004 5:42 pm
Subject: Re: Call,OWL,XML Schema, JRC P3P1.1. Implementation

> Thanks Giles, this is great!
> 
> Rigo, where do we stand on spec editing. Does the July 20 draft 
> have 
> everything in it except the XML schema stuff?
> 
> (Just noticed that the list of contributors needs to be updated to 
> include Serge Egelman, CMU invited expert)
> 
> Giles, if you could get us the schema insert this week that would 
> be 
> great.
> 
> I would like to revisit section 1.1.1 to make sure all of the 
> major 
> changes are highlighted there. I will try to do that this week as 
> well.
> Then Rigo can put out another WD that is a candidate for Last 
> Call. 
> Rigo is it feasible to get that out next week, preferably by 
> August 25 
> at the latest?
> 
> Then I would propose that we announce on the mailing list that if 
> there 
> are no objections within one week, that we will go to last call. 
> Unless 
> people raise any issues, there is no need for a conference call 
> except 
> to have an official vote. So I would like to try to have that call 
> on 
> September 1. Then Last call can be issued some time the first week 
> in 
> September and we'll plan on closing the LC period 6 weeks later.
> 
> Let me know what you think so I can let the WG know what the plan is.
> 
> Lorrie
> 
> 
> On Aug 16, 2004, at 8:41 AM, Giles Hogben wrote:
> 
> > Hi Rigo, Lorrie,
> >
> > For the JRC implementation of P3P1.1 - I  spoke to Marc and he 
> said we
> > can do it by spring next year and we can allocate some programming
> > time for it.
> >
> > For the meeting this week - I have decided to take some vacation 
> this> week so I'd really like to not attend - but can do by 
> cellphone if
> > absolutely necessary. I can send an insert for the schema stuff for
> > the spec detailing what we decided in the last call and you can go
> > ahead without me, or we can delay till next week? What do you 
think?
> >
> > I have finished a first draft of the P3P OWL stuff - in the 
> format you
> > suggested (actually it's openoffice html cleaned up a bit). 
Actually
> > it will also be the basis of the early prototype for PRIME.
> > I attach the spec docs and you can find the demo app (a sw 
> version of
> > the JRC proxy - it's nice!!) in the PRIME CVS under D7.1a. -  
> (Rigo -
> > get a un/password from Mike Bergman at TU Dresden if you don't have
> > one).
> >
> > Giles
> > <OWLP3P.zip>
> 
> 



Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:30:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.1 : Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:30:31 GMT