On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:52:23AM -0500, Humphrey, Jack wrote: > > There were some questions about the goals of this proposal. People > > thought it was useful for companies to be able to declare that all of > > their multiple domains are owned by a single company and comply with > > the same policy, but there was less interest in being able to declare > > that companies belong to an ad network. The reason browsers are > > treating these as third party cookies is that is how consumers seem to > > want to see them treated. > > I see this point. This proposal actually only addresses declaring that > multiple domains belong to the same company. It does not attempt to address > the agent/ad network type of relationships. I will make that clear in my > upcoming proposed specification changes. One of the reasons we came up with thoughts about agent/domain relationsships was the ability to express contractual relationsships between entities and to ease the task of integrating content from different parties. As far as I can see, there is only a proposal about the same entity, but no proposal for services acting as agents e.g. Jack, could you please explore and report back on the call of 1 oct.? Thanks -- Rigo Wenning W3C/ERCIM Policy Analyst Privacy Activity Lead mail:rigo@w3.org 2004, Routes des Lucioles http://www.w3.org/ F-06902 Sophia AntipolisReceived on Tuesday, 23 September 2003 09:09:06 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 17 March 2004 17:46:27 EST