Re: [BH] First (Very Rought) Outline of Beyond HTTP

On Tuesday 20 May 2003 09:59, Patrick.Hung@csiro.au wrote:
> I don't quite understand here as I can't find anything related to "XML
> Encryption"
> in the working draft.

"This may be expressed via policy (such as [SOAP] headers) or ensured via 
various end-to-end mechanisms such as session security [TLS] or document 
security [XENC]."


> I read the working draft again. I think that the "Transfering Data to a
> Third
> Party" section is strongly related to the "Intermediaries." 

Intermediaries is a subheading (H3) of Transfering Data to a Third Party 
(H2)...?

> There is a few minor typos, and you can find them by using "find:"
>
> (1) ".."
> (2) "a a"
> (3) "th"

Fixed.

> (4) "business to consumer" should it be "business-to-consumer?"

Don't think so, I was quoting from EPAL too.

> Beside it, I also consider
> whether we should also introduce P3P into UDDI in order to attract UDDI
> researchers.

I don't know to what degree they've considered that, but if they haven't 
given the issue any thought they might appreciate the introduction.

> In addition, have you ever thought about XrML for protecting the privacy
> of digital content as what Microsoft is doing right now? Should we also
> mention that in this working draft.

I'm not included to do so presently. My sense is that we have a fairly rich 
collection of references and dependencies, and while I'm sure we'll 
accumulate a few more, I don't want to take them on without specific 
motivations not already addressed.

-- 
* I will be travelling May 22/23, and attending OSCOM3 May 28-30. 
I will not be as responsive during these periods but will 
respond to any email as soon as possible upon my return.

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2003 14:25:25 UTC