W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > May 2003

RE: [BH] First (Very Rought) Outline of Beyond HTTP

From: <Patrick.Hung@csiro.au>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:39:06 +1000
Message-ID: <754324CDE8E4EE4498D8E0357D91368501601049@saab-bt.act.cmis.CSIRO.AU>
To: reagle@w3.org, public-p3p-spec@w3.org

Hi Joseph,

Based on your XForm example [2], I am <simply/> creating a sample WSDL
for the registry's "register" service as follows:

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<definitions name='Register'


    <import namespace='http://registry.example.com/register/schemas'

    <my:Privacy my:rel='P3Pv1'

    <message name='RegisterDomainNameInput'>
        <part name='body' element='my:OrderInfo'/>

    <message name='RegisterDomainNameOutput'>
        <part name='body' element='my:RegistrationStatus'/>

    <portType name='RegisterDomainNamePortType'>
        <operation name='RegisterDomainName'>
           <input message='tns:RegisterDomainNameInput'/>
           <output message='tns:RegisterDomainNameOutput'/>

    <binding name='RegisterDomainNameSoapBinding'
        <soap:binding style='document'
        <operation name='RegisterDomainName'>
               <soap:body use='literal'/>
               <soap:body use='literal'/>

    <service name='RegisterService'>
        <documentation>Register Service</documentation>
        <port name='RegisterDomainNamePort'
           <soap:address location='http://registry.example.com/register'/>


The P3P policy is also optionally associated with the WSDL document. Would
you please check it
and tell me your comments? Is that what you expect in the "Associating with
a WSDL Description" 
section [2]? In this case, both the XForm and WSDL are referring to the same
schema for the
data category. From another aspect, this is a *bit* like the ideas of

Once this sample WSDL document is ok, I will create the sample SOAP message
and put the P3P policy 
or even a P3P compact policy in the SOAP header with all the descriptions.

Many thanks and talk to you soon.


-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, 9 May 2003 9:13 AM
To: Patrick.Hung@csiro.au; public-p3p-spec@w3.org
Subject: Re: [BH] First (Very Rought) Outline of Beyond HTTP

On Thursday 08 May 2003 15:43, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> This generally sounds ok, though I plan on using XForms with serialized
> XML [1] as part of the user2registrar interface, and SOAP (or UDDI/WSDL
> as approriate) for the registrar to registry. So please don't worry about
> the user2registrar via SOAP bit.

[2] Now has the XForm fragment (using a simple link element for the policy 
association) and the resulting XML. Now we need to input this into the SOAP 
interaction between the registrar and registry.

[2] http://www.w3.org/P3P/2003/p3p-beyond-http/
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 05:39:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:17 UTC