Re: [Bug 167] explanation of identified, identifiable, and linked

Ari, 

you have _not_ taken into account my lengthy comments nor the comments
from Robert Horn _not_ to mix usage/storage/type into the term identity.
The idea expressed below is still the same. 

This will create heavy confusion as scope, processing and purpose are
mixed together. I think we should work it out together. Your definitions
sound compelling only at a first glance.

Rigo

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:22:35PM -0400, Ari Schwartz wrote:
> Identity Through Usage ("identified" data)
[...]
> 
> Identity Through Storage ("non-identifiable" and "linked" data)
[...]
> 
> Identity Through Information Type
> 
[...]

Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 13:58:50 UTC