W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: IMPORTANT: Proposal to publish *Edited* OWL 2 Recommendation

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:44:18 -0400
Message-ID: <5052A812.2010204@w3.org>
To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 09/13/2012 09:14 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Hmm. I don't see any diffs, colour coded or otherwise.
>

They're linked from the drafts, in several place each.  Look for the 
phrase 'color-coded'.

> I'm particularly looking at Section 14 of the functional syntax 
> document, which I would have expected to be shown as a diff.
>

It does link to the Errata Handling page which links to the wiki diffs 
for each edit, but for the whole document at once, it's probably easiest 
to use the ones mentioned above.

     -- Sandro

> peter
>
>
>
> On 09/13/2012 03:42 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Sorry for the long email -- but please do read as it is IMPORTANT.
>>
>> As anticipated when we published the OWL 2 Recommendation, members of 
>> the OWL Working Group have updated the various OWL 2 Recommendation 
>> documents to reflect the fact that the XML Schema Definition Language 
>> (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes [1] is now a recommendation (as of 5 
>> April 2012). At the same time, they have made minor corrections to 
>> address issues documented on the OWL 2 Errata page [2].
>>
>> The resulting Editors' drafts (with color coded diffs) can be 
>> accessed via the OWL Working Group wiki:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_Working_Group#Drafts
>>
>> It is proposed to request publication of each of these documents. For 
>> the Recommendations, this will involve a round of AC Review as 
>> Proposed Edited Recommendations and publication as "Second Edition" 
>> Recommendations; the WG Notes will simply be updated in place.
>>
>> Can you please review the documents and complete the questionnaire at:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/41712/second-edition/
>>
>> saying if you approve this action, abstain or formally object.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ian Horrocks
>> OWL Working Group Co-Chair
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Errata
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 03:44:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 September 2012 03:44:32 GMT