W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: IMPORTANT: Proposal to publish *Edited* OWL 2 Recommendation

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:14:44 -0400
Message-ID: <50528504.7000100@gmail.com>
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@cs.ox.ac.uk>
CC: "public-owl-wg@w3.org 2" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hmm.  I don't see any diffs, colour coded or otherwise.

I'm particularly looking at Section 14 of the functional syntax document, 
which I would have expected to be shown as a diff.

peter



On 09/13/2012 03:42 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Sorry for the long email -- but please do read as it is IMPORTANT.
>
> As anticipated when we published the OWL 2 Recommendation, members of the OWL Working Group have updated the various OWL 2 Recommendation documents to reflect the fact that the XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes [1] is now a recommendation (as of 5 April 2012). At the same time, they have made minor corrections to address issues documented on the OWL 2 Errata page [2].
>
> The resulting Editors' drafts (with color coded diffs) can be accessed via the OWL Working Group wiki:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_Working_Group#Drafts
>
> It is proposed to request publication of each of these documents. For the Recommendations, this will involve a round of AC Review as Proposed Edited Recommendations and publication as "Second Edition" Recommendations; the WG Notes will simply be updated in place.
>
> Can you please review the documents and complete the questionnaire at:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/41712/second-edition/
>
> saying if you approve this action, abstain or formally object.
>
> Regards,
> Ian Horrocks
> OWL Working Group Co-Chair
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Errata
>
>
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 01:15:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 September 2012 01:15:16 GMT