Re: status of xsd:duration in RDF from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2012-05-09 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2012)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:09:21 -0400
To: "public-owl-wg@w3.org" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
CC: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@cs.ox.ac.uk>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4FAA88A1.4070509@gmail.com>

Regardless of whether xsd:duration can make it into OWL 2, there is a question 
of whether anyone in this group knows of any reason why xsd:duration should 
not be added to RDF by the current RDF WG, aside from a desire to have the 
datatypes in OWL match those in RDF.

Any comments?

peter

Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 15:09:57 UTC