W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2012

Re: OWL equivalentClass question

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:58:06 +0100
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, semantic-web@w3.org, nathan@webr3.org, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <44832F53-114F-44B6-A01C-3D0E608D46AF@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Oh, for example,

Skolemization:
	Blah blah blah definition blah blah balh.
	Note: Many applications and specifications rely on non-skolemized graphs. The skolemization operation almost certainly will break these, causing rejection of the skolemized graph or unanticipated results. Skolemization should be regarded as a destructive operation.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2012 09:58:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 15 July 2012 09:58:28 GMT