W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Rec

From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:54:42 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670910280554h18c54dadm3fe9df6b9779ee64@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> First: HURRAH!
>
> Second: Congrats!
>
> Third: Wow, it's functionally over. We hit rec in 2 years which was longer
> than I had hoped, but given some of the issues unearthed (and the resulting
> quality) isn't too bad at all. I, personally, have been working toward this
> since at least 2005 (as have many other folks), so it's exciting to hit
> completion and for completion not to be a deathmarch thing :)
>
> On 28 Oct 2009, at 10:42, Ivan Herman wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> We would also have to have some discussions on what should happen on the
>> community side; what should happen with /2004/OWL, where would we
>> collect implementation data for OWL etc. I am in favour of some wiki
>> based solution, and we will have to work out the details before the end
>> of the year...
>
> The webont.org wiki hasn't gotten a huge amount of traction but it is
> available. Maintaining lists of tools and tutorials and extensions and
> applications is a good thing.
>
I'm personally interested in publishing the OWL WG data (wiki,
documents, members, issues, actions, meetings) as "linked data". But I
really don't know how long it will take if it is just me as a hobby
project.

The OWL WG should use OWL 2 for its own sake :)

Jie

-----
Jie Bao
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie


> Cheers,
> Bijan.
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 12:55:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 28 October 2009 12:55:43 GMT