W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: progress on OWL going to Rec

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:54:15 -0400
Message-ID: <20091023.155415.40882262.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <sandro@w3.org>
CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
The Manchester Syntax document has three broken internal links:
1 from the part on recent changes and two from the mime stuff (to
references). 
I don't know what to do to fix the recent change link.
I don't know which references are needed for the mime stuff.


peter


From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: progress on OWL going to Rec
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:39:21 -0500

> 
> The date has slipped slightly, but I think we're still basically on
> track.  Expected publication date is next Tuesday (the first day the
> ISWC conference track).
> 
> Please keep checking drafts, now at and linked from:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-overview-20091027/
> 
> Send e-mail to the list if you make any changes or see any problems that
> we should fix before publication.  In particular, I bet the color-code
> diff and the changelog don't always agree.  :-)
> 
> My TODO list:
>    - change "Latest Version" to be "Latest Version of OWL" and "Latest
>      Version of OWL 2", as per http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions
>    - add notes, as discussed, to OWL 1 documents, on publication day
>    - maybe do something about hosting/archiving test suite on w3.org
>    - maybe try to make the XHTML a more HTML friendly
> 
> I'm not expecting to do anything more on this until Monday evening, as I
> have other obligations, and I think I've done my bits.
> 
>    -- Sandro
> 
Received on Friday, 23 October 2009 19:55:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 October 2009 19:55:15 GMT