RE: the owl.owl file

Hi!

Yes, "based on" seems better.

Cheers,
Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>On Behalf Of Rinke Hoekstra
>Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:24 AM
>To: Michael Schneider
>Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org; Sandro Hawke
>Subject: Re: the owl.owl file
>
>Hi Michael,
>
>I think it is only good to refer back to the actual specification.
>Though perhaps 'corresponds' should be 'based on' to subtly indicate
>the primacy of the actual specification over the owl.owl file.
>
>Rinke

--
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
=======================================================================
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
=======================================================================

Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 10:19:26 UTC