W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2009

Fwd: OWL 2 Call for Review

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:02:57 +0100
Message-Id: <59236019-FF4A-42CC-8A42-D1FB389968CD@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I am surprised and disappointed to note that, to date, only two  
members of the WG appear to have voted regarding the publication of  
our documents as W3C Recommendations. I would have expected that  
members of the WG would at least have an opinion!


Begin forwarded message:

> Resent-From: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
> Date: 28 September 2009 12:45:07 BDT
> To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: OWL 2 Call for Review
> Sorry if this is obvious to you, but it didn't seem very obvious to  
> me.
> There is a questionnaire at [1] that asks AC members to "indicate  
> whether you endorse [the OWL 2 specs] as W3C Recommendations". I  
> assume that (most) members of the WG support the advancement of OWL  
> to Recommendation and so will want to ask their AC reps to complete  
> the questionnaire accordingly!
> Thanks,
> Ian
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/owl2_pr/
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:03:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:03:31 GMT