W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:52:36 -0400
Message-ID: <20090527.125236.246682470.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <baojie@gmail.com>
CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
This message appears to be truncated.  Did anyone receive a complete
copy of it?

peter


From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:45:14 -0500

> Unfortunately, I will be able to attend the 1pm telcon for travel reasons.
> 
> I would like to have my proxy votes (as RPI official stance per AC's
> instruction) to all the four proposals as given in [1]
> 
> * PROPOSED: the name of the rdf:text datatype be changed to rdf:PlainLiteral
> 
> +1
> 
> * PROPOSED: rdf:text: A Datatype for RDF Plain Literals is ready for
> publication as a Candidate Recommendation
> +1
> 
> * PROPOSED: go ahead with publication of Structural Specification and
> Functional-Style Syntax, Mapping to RDF Graphs, Direct Semantics,
> RDF-Based Semantics, Conformance, Profiles and XML Serialization as
> Candidate Recommendations as per last week's resolution based on the
> CR exit criteria and with name change from rdf:text to
> rdf:PlainLiteral
> 
> RPI will vote
> * +1, if the WG acceptsthe RPI proposal on new CR criteria [2], otherwise
> * -1, and we reserve our right to object formally later in the process
> if it is not changed - this is not because we oppose the design, but
> because we think the current wording is too vague an
> 
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 17:19:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC