W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009

From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:57:33 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670905270957h6e6e81atdfb1a899aaf7cb54@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Seems my previous mail was incomplete (due to some problem on my
phone), thus I have it resent by a proxy.

==========

I would like to have my proxy votes (as RPI official stance per AC's
instruction) to all the four proposals as given in [1]

* PROPOSED: the name of the rdf:text datatype be changed to rdf:PlainLiteral

+1

* PROPOSED: rdf:text: A Datatype for RDF Plain Literals is ready for
publication as a Candidate Recommendation
+1

* PROPOSED: go ahead with publication of Structural Specification and
Functional-Style Syntax, Mapping to RDF Graphs, Direct Semantics,
RDF-Based Semantics, Conformance, Profiles and XML Serialization as
Candidate Recommendations as per last week's resolution based on the
CR exit criteria and with name change from rdf:text to
rdf:PlainLiteral

RPI will vote
* +1, if the WG accepts the RPI proposal on new CR criteria [2], otherwise
* -1, and we reserve our right to object formally later in the process
if it is not changed - this is not because we oppose the design, but
because we think the current wording is too vague and not easily
checked.

* PROPOSED: Quick Reference Guide is ready for publication as a Last
Call Working Draft

+1

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.05.27/Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009May/0319.html
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 16:58:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC