W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009

From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:51:36 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670905270951o66fec8cal9ad1ca10e5c28244@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
correction: i will not be able to call in.

sent from phone

jie

On 5/27/09, Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, I will be able to attend the 1pm telcon for travel reasons.
>
> I would like to have my proxy votes (as RPI official stance per AC's
> instruction) to all the four proposals as given in [1]
>
> * PROPOSED: the name of the rdf:text datatype be changed to
> rdf:PlainLiteral
>
> +1
>
> * PROPOSED: rdf:text: A Datatype for RDF Plain Literals is ready for
> publication as a Candidate Recommendation
> +1
>
> * PROPOSED: go ahead with publication of Structural Specification and
> Functional-Style Syntax, Mapping to RDF Graphs, Direct Semantics,
> RDF-Based Semantics, Conformance, Profiles and XML Serialization as
> Candidate Recommendations as per last week's resolution based on the
> CR exit criteria and with name change from rdf:text to
> rdf:PlainLiteral
>
> RPI will vote
> * +1, if the WG acceptsthe RPI proposal on new CR criteria [2], otherwise
> * -1, and we reserve our right to object formally later in the process
> if it is not changed - this is not because we oppose the design, but
> because we think the current wording is too vague an
>


-- 
Jie Bao
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 16:52:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC