W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

RE: First Look version of the test collection for the RDF-Based Semantics

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:12:11 +0200
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0014139E2@judith.fzi.de>
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>On Behalf Of Bijan Parsia
>Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:13 PM
>To: OWL 1.1
>Subject: Re: First Look version of the test collection for the RDF-Based
>How is this going to integrate into the current test suite? 


What you see there is the "source code" of the tests. They will be translated into the format used in the Test Wiki (according to what is described in the "Conformance" document), and then being uploded there. So there will be absolutely no difference to what is already around: One test, one entry in the Test Wiki.

>I don't
>think anyone had any notion that the RDF-Based semantics would go off
>and do it's own thing (to the point of having a *generator*!?! in the

There is nothing different. There is, of course, a common naming scheme: all test cases start by "rdfbased-...". And they will be marked with the "RDFBASED" flag, and whatever is needed according to the test ontology to say that they are specifically intended to be used for implementations of the RDF-Based Semantics. But nothing else.

Except for: I will, on the fly, generate an overview page, which will point to all the test cases in the Test Wiki and provide additional describing texts. But that's just for convenience of people who care, and is only planned as a page in the OWL Wiki (not necessarily in the Test Wiki), at the address I gave in my previous mail.

>I find it very very very surprising and, coming at this late date,
>it's the sort of surprising that is grumpy making.

It's certainly late, but not too late, I'd say. Test suite production is what is currently happening in our WG.

>Or is this not meant to be part of our documents? That's much less
>grumpy making. But that's hard to square with other things you've
>written about these tests...

I'm not sure what you mean by "part of our documents". It is simply meant to be yet another bunch of test cases in the test wiki, specifically addressing OWL 2 Full.



Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 09:12:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC