W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: CR Exit Criteria

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:36:32 -0400
Message-ID: <20090522.073632.181636199.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: CR Exit Criteria
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:04:44 -0500

> On 21 May 2009, at 00:53, Peter F.Patel-Schneider wrote:

[...]

>> 1. Resolve dependencies on rdf:text (currently at Last Call) and XSD
>>    1.1 Datatypes (currently at Candidate Recommendation).
>>> or put rdf:text as risk as described in previous email
> 
> We agreed to make it "at risk" in the spec, so we should mention it  
> here. I added "Note that rdf:text is marked as "at risk", and may be  
> removed from the OWL 2 specification."

Umm, if rdf:text goes away OWL 2 needs something to replace it with, so
I think that the wording should be something like

"Note that rdf:text is marked as "at risk", and may be replaced with a
datatype with name owl:text that serves the same purpose.
Implementations will be able to switch to owl:text by simply replacing
occurences of rdf:text with owl:text."

[...]

> Ian

peter
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 11:37:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC