I checked Overview, Profiles and Conformance, and everything looks good. Ian On 21 May 2009, at 17:54, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > Unfortunately, the problem with getting false-positive reports of > broken > links from the link checker seems to be sporadic. We haven't been > able > to reproduce it reliably. > > The good side of that is that the new link check reports look much > better. There may still be false positives in it, but as I randomly > tried bits of it, I only found one [1]/ > > So please look over the checklinks outputs here: > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks > > Thanks! > > - Sandro > > > [1] NFR links to http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ > Who_Reads_Our_Documents#Database_Federation_Engineer . I believe > this link is correct, but falsely reported as a problem. >Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 09:15:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 May 2009 09:15:10 GMT