W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Check links

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:15:33 -0400
Message-ID: <20090521.101533.38007158.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
CC: <sandro@w3.org>, <schneid@fzi.de>, <cgolbrei@gmail.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Sandro will set up his set of hoops at some point, and then we can jump
through them.   :-)

peter


From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Subject: Re: Check links
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:09:42 -0500

> All,
> 
> I manually checked the links in NF&R earlier in the week.  Are we 
> confident that
> correct wiki links will generate correct html links, or will we have to 
> re-check the
> links in the html rendering of these docs?  More generally, what do we 
> expect that
> the editors of the documents will need to do between now and actual 
> publication
> and when?
> 
> -Evan
> 
> Michael Schneider wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The NF&R document seems to be hit particularly hard by the problem Peter
>> reported earlier this day. NF&R contains many deep-links into other
>> documents, and the CheckLinks tool claims that many of these links (or more
>> precisely: their fragments) are broken. However, from the sample of links
>> that I checked manually, it looks to me that they are all fine.
>>
>> CheckLinks should really be fixed soon.
>>  
>> Michael
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 14:16:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC