W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Status of OWL 2 Profiles

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:48:19 -0400
Message-ID: <20090520.124819.166208029.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <baojie@gmail.com>
CC: <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, <achille@us.ibm.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I am puzzled as to what changes are thought to be needed in the Profiles
document?  I have not been able to find any suggested changes or even
indications of deficiencies in the Profiles document in any recent
messages to the WG.  Absent any indication of what needs to be changed,
I am very puzzled as to why the Profiles document should not be
considered to be "ready for the CR publication step".

peter



From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of OWL 2 Profiles
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:31:46 -0500

> Ian
> 
> I noticed the changes in Profiles, and thank editors for incorporating
> our comments.
> 
> As you may see from Jim's posts, from RPI point of view, we believe
> Profiles still need some work before LC, although it is an excellent
> document in many other ways. I'm sorry to say this, but that's not a
> personal choice.
> 
> Jie
> 
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Ian Horrocks
> <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Dear Achille and Jie,
>>
>> As LC1 reviewers of Profiles can you please take a *very* quick look at the
>> latest version and confirm that you are OK with any minor changes that may
>> have occurred since the 1st Last Call and that, in your opinion, the
>> document is "CR-ready".
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jie Bao
> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
> 
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 16:48:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC