W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:34:07 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0905191234s67558a8dgab114df66a542b7d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Ok, this works:

See http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_XML_Schema_test_include2 for
how to include.

Schema raw, is in http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_XML_Schema_test

You get raw schema with


On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 19 May 2009, at 20:15, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> On 19 May 2009, at 19:03, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>>> I think this can be worked around by instead of wrapping the schema in
>>>> <pre> tags, instead putting a space in front of each line in the
>>>> source that doesn't already start with a space.
>>> I already tried this and pretty much every other way. It doesn't
>>> produce acceptable results. Don't bother.
>>>> The whitespace should be ignored by schema readers, and the initial
>>>> space forces the line to be preformatted.
>>>> I'm still looking for a cleaner solution.
>>> The simple solution is to pick a different W3.org temporary URI for
>>> the download and copy the schema there after stripping off the URI. I
>>> don't see why this can't be done :)
>> I'm not sure I fully understand, but yes, let's stop fighting with the
>> wiki.  I'm guessing someone should maintain the master copy of the
>> schema.  And they should:
>>     - paste it into whatever wiki page(s) it need(s) to be in, quoted
>>       as necessary, whenever it changes;
>>     - send me a new copy to put at the namespace, whenever necessary.
>> The live-from-the-wiki trick seemed worth a try, but it's not worth a
>> lot of hassle.
> The current live-from-the-wiki schema is, minus the pre tags, *the* current
> schema. So could  you put it where you're going to put it?
> Once I have that uri, I can update the wiki page with the new download link.
> If it's cvs controlled, I suppose I could take over managing it directly.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 19:35:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC