W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:55:06 -0400
Message-ID: <20090518.165506.233575769.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>, <evren@clarkparsia.com>
From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:28:50 -0500

> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Peter F.Patel-Schneider
> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what part of the documents you are basing this behaviour
>> on.   As far as I can see our documents leave it completely up to
>> implementations as to how they are to implement the relationship between
>> rdf:text literals and plain literals, and this is how it should be.
> 
> In this message from Sandro he asserts that it was a requirement of HP
> for moving to last call that rdf:text literals do not "escape" into
> RDF.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2009AprJun/0077.html
> 
> -Alan

Sure, but why should this affect any document except the rdf:text
document?  Our relevant documents defer to rdf:text, which is only
appropriate.

peter
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 20:55:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC