W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: New draft for JC5

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:24:29 +0100
Message-Id: <4D29726A-F05C-4E74-B8D5-F652AE64AA8D@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: <schneid@fzi.de>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
I also agree: the change is essentially editorial, and you discussed  
and agreed it at last week's teleconf.

I changed "have changed" to "will change" as suggested by Peter. I am  
happy for the response can be sent forthwith.

Thanks,
Ian



On 17 May 2009, at 20:44, Peter F.Patel-Schneider wrote:

> From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
> Subject: New draft for JC5
> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:55:55 -0500
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> After my private discussion with TQ concerning the annotation
>> vocabulary, I have created a new draft
>>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC2_Responses/JC5>
>>
>> I believe that we will need to first vote on the renaming of the
>> vocabulary terms, then do the changes in the documents (several
>> documents are involved), and only then sent the response to Jeremy. I
>> think, we can do the changes and sending the response on Wednesday
>> after the TQ, and do our voting into CR modulo these changes. Given
>> the (un-official) positive feedback by TQ, this should not lead to
>> problems.
>>
>> Michael
>
> I agree with Bijan and think that you can send it earlier.  (You might
> want to say "will change" instead of "changed".)  There was discussion
> at the last TC and I don't see any dissent.  We can officially vote on
> Wednesday.
>
> peter
>
Received on Sunday, 17 May 2009 20:25:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC