W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Response to JC5

From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:58:30 -0400
Message-ID: <4A0EF0B6.7060408@cme.nist.gov>
To: "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org

Peter Patel-Schneider wrote about my suggestion to add a list of new owl 
terms for the
OWL2 vocabulary for rdf to our document set:

> This is not a good idea.  Consider, for example, if it is wrong.
>
> peter
That could easily be addressed, but having this list is not a big deal 
to me. I
withdraw the suggestion.

-Evan

Received on Saturday, 16 May 2009 16:59:14 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Schneider: "RE: Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics"
Previous message: Sebastian Rudolph: "Re: Review of Primer"
In reply to: Peter F.Patel-Schneider: "Re: Response to JC5"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 16 May 2009 16:59:15 GMT