W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Response to JC5

From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:58:30 -0400
Message-ID: <4A0EF0B6.7060408@cme.nist.gov>
To: "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Peter Patel-Schneider wrote about my suggestion to add a list of new owl 
terms for the
OWL2 vocabulary for rdf to our document set:

> This is not a good idea.  Consider, for example, if it is wrong.
> peter
That could easily be addressed, but having this list is not a big deal 
to me. I
withdraw the suggestion.

Received on Saturday, 16 May 2009 16:59:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC