W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Response to JC5

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:29:56 -0400
Message-ID: <20090515.192956.82819662.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
This is not a good idea.  Consider, for example, if it is wrong.

peter


From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Subject: Re: Response to JC5
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:20:20 -0400

> [trying again with different From:]
> 
> Michael Schneider wrote:
>> The change of the names, as we
>> have discussed yesterday, is crucial:
>>
>>   owl:subject   --> owl:annotatedSource
>>   owl:predicate --> owl:annotatedProperty
>>   owl:object    --> owl:annotatedTarget
>>
>> And possibly also some explaining text, probably in NF&R and/or Primer,
>> that
>> the annotation vocabulary is meant to be used exclusively for annotation
>> purposes in the specifically defined way, if there isn't such text
>> already.
> 
> Do we have anywhere in our document set a concise list of the vocabulary
> changes for the rdf rendering of OWL for OWL2?  It might make sense to
> put such a list in NF&R.  A compiled the following list (in order of
> discovery) from a quick scan of the mapping document and QRG:
> 
> owl:subject   --> owl:annotatedSource
> owl:predicate --> owl:annotatedProperty
> owl:object    --> owl:annotatedTarget
> owl:versionIRI
> owl:NamedIndividual
> owl:datatypeComplementOf
> owl:withRestrictions
> owl:hasSelf
> owl:minQualifiedCardinality
> owl:onClass
> owl:maxQualifiedCardinality
> owl:onProperties
> owl:onDataRange
> owl:members
> owl:AllDisjointClasses
> owl:disjointUnionOf
> owl:propertyChainAxiom
> owl:propertyDisjointWith
> owl:AllDisjointProperties
> owl:ReflexiveProperty
> owl:IrreflexiveProperty
> owl:AsymmetricProperty
> owl:hasKey
> owl:sourceIndividual
> owl:assertionProperty
> owl:targetIndividual
> owl:NegativePropertyAssertion
> owl:targetValue
> owl:Annotation
> owl:Axiom
> owl:onDatatype
> owl:qualifiedCardinality
> 
> owl:topObjectProperty
> owl:bottomObjectProperty
> 
> owl:topDataProperty
> owl:bottomDataProperty
> 
> owl:real
> owl:rational
> 
> Am I missing anything?
> 
> -Evan
> 
> Evan K. Wallace
> Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
> NIST
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 23:29:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:12 UTC